This post contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. Terms apply to the offers listed on this page. For an explanation of our Advertising Policy, visit this page.

Even though the laws of physics have not changed the principles of flight since the Wright brothers’ flight over 100 years ago, the technology of modern-day aircraft has changed considerably.

With advances in science came better and more reliable sources of electricity, to the point where more and more aircraft systems were able to use electricity.

This has led to modern-day aircraft such as the Boeing 787 Dreamliner which uses electricity to power more systems than any other aircraft in history.

However, with such a reliance on this power, what happens if there is a failure? What happens if the aircraft manages to somehow lose all power?

The generation of electricity on an aircraft is exactly the same as it is done on the ground. In coal, gas and nuclear power stations around the world, water is heated to produce steam. This is why these forms of power generation are also known as thermal power.

This steam is then driven through a series of turbine blades which spins up a shaft connected to an electrical generator.

Inside the generator are a mass of magnets and coiled wire. The spinning shaft is used to rotate the magnets around the coiled wire, creating an electrical current. This power is then taken off to the electrical grid and distributed around the country.

The creation of electricity in this way ultimately depends on the generation of an electrical current by spinning a shaft to turn the magnets. Whether you use coal, gas or nuclear power, the method is the same — using energy in boiled water — steam — to create the kinetic energy in the shaft.

Thinking laterally, if all we need to create electricity is a spinning shaft, there are a few other ways this can be done.

Since the early days of science, mankind has been harnessing the power of the wind to its advantage. Whether it was in the sails of boats to power them across oceans or in the blades of windmills to crush grain, the kinetic energy of shifting air pressure has, and always will be, a source of free, clean energy.

In a traditional windmill, the turning blades are used to drive a shaft to crush grain, allowing millers to make flour for bread. The same principle is used in the modern-day wind turbine, instead using the energy from the wind to drive a shaft to turn an electrical generator, much like that in a power station.

There is another machine that uses a turbine, to cause rotation — a jet engine.

The electrical system of a modern-day airliner is incredibly complex, but at the same time, simple in its operation.

Aircraft engines use hot fast-moving air created by the ignition of jet fuel in the combustion chamber to drive turbine blades in the rear of the engine, generating thrust.

The spinning of these blades also turns a central shaft which, apart from being a central part in keeping the engine running, can also be used to turn an electrical generator.

On the 787 Dreamliner, there are two 235Vac variable frequency engine starter/generators (VFSGs) in each engine. Using a series of gears, kinetic energy is taken from the central drive shaft of the engine and fed into the VFSG. Here, like our generators on the ground, magnets are turned around wire coils and electricity is generated.

This power is then delivered to an AC ‘bus’, a place from which all aircraft electrical systems can source their power — much like a multi-plug extension cord.

The early uses of electricity in aircraft were limited to radios, flight instruments and lighting. However, with advances in technology, modern-day aircraft are using electricity for more and more systems.

Conspicuously in the cabin, electricity is used for almost everything you can see. From the entertainment screens and the charging sockets in your seat area to the lighting above your head and the ovens and chillers in the galley.

However, one of the biggest leaps in aircraft technology was the invention of fly-by-wire flight controls.

Traditional aircraft use a series of cables and pulleys to connect the flight controls in the cockpit directly to the control surfaces on the wings and tail. The simplicity of this method means that it’s still used on light aircraft today.

However, with modern-day airliners, the speed of air over the control surfaces means that much greater physical strength is needed to move the controls. In addition, all this metal is heavy and the heavier the aircraft, the more fuel it needs to fly.

To reduce this weight and to make it easier for the pilots, airliners now use a system known as fly-by-wire. Inputs to the controls in the flight deck send electrical signals to computers which, in turn, send other electrical signals to the relevant part of the aircraft.

Here, they activate motors and pumps to move the system as demanded by the pilots. This not only saves tons of weight but also means larger aircraft such as the A380, feel exactly the same flying as smaller aircraft like the A320.

Stopping a 200-tonne aircraft landing at 160 mph requires a lot of braking force and to do this, the 787 has eight wheels on the main gear assembly — each of which has a brake unit. On other aircraft types, the brake units are powered by the hydraulics system. An electrical signal is sent from the flight deck to hydraulic actuators near the main landing gear. Here, hydraulic fluid at 3000psi is used to force the brake unit against the wheel, thus slowing it down.

This system works fine, but the pipes and actuators that form this part of the hydraulic system come at a considerable weight cost. Extra weight means more fuel burn, which in turn increases costs and carbon emissions. What if the brakes could be powered a different way?

That’s the case on the Dreamliner. Designers did away with the use of the hydraulic system and all its associated architecture and instead used electricity to power the brakes. When the pilots press on the brake pedals, an electrical signal is sent directly to the brake unit on the wheel. Here, electrically powered actuators are used to press the carbon brake disc against the wheel, slowing it down.

By changing to electric brakes, a 787-8 saves 64kg per aircraft and a 787-9 saves 111kg. The brakes are also known as ‘Plug and Play’ because electrical wiring replaces the traditional hydraulics and it’s much easier and quicker to change the brake units when needed. Smart features also allow engineers to monitor the brake performance more closely, giving a real-time measurement of wear on the carbon disks.

Another system which is powered electrically on the 787 is the anti-ice system. As aircraft fly through clouds in cold temperatures, ice can build up along the leading edge of the wing. As this reduces the efficiency of the wing, we need to get rid of it.

Other aircraft types use hot air from the engines to melt it. On the 787, we use electrically powered pads along the leading edge which heat up to melt the ice.

Not only does this keep more power in the engines, but it also reduces the drag created as the hot air leaves the structure of the wing. A double win for fuel savings.

Modern-day airliners are built on a system of redundancies. If one component of a system fails then there will be a backup. For the most important systems, there will be a backup for the backup. So what about the electrical system?

Each of the two engines has 2 generators each, so that’s 4 in total. If one of these was to fail, first and foremost, nothing exciting will happen. The aircraft will continue to fly normally and the other 3 generators will continue to supply the aircraft systems demanding power. Sat in the cabin, you’d have no idea this had happened.

The message alerting the pilots to the failure will lead them to the associated non-normal checklist which calls for them to try and reset it. If this works, great. If not, it’s still not a problem.

In the tail of the aircraft is another small engine called the Auxiliary Power Unit. The APU contains 2 electrical generators, capable of providing the same power as the ones in the engine. The failed generator checklist then instructs the pilots to start the APU, powering those generators and returning the system to a full set of generators.

In the case of an engine failure, the aircraft would lose 2 generators. Still, the aircraft would fly perfectly well and once again, the associated checklist would instruct the pilots to start the APU, returning the aircraft to a full complement of 4 generators.

In the highly unlikely event of a dual engine failure, there is an extra backup that comes to the rescue. Hidden away in the underside of the aircraft is a small propellor called the Ram Air Turbine, or RAT. If the aircraft detects that both engines have failed in flight, the RAT automatically deploys into the airflow. (It will also automatically deploy if the aircraft detects several other faults in various other systems, including the hydraulics).

The oncoming air causes the propellor to spin, driving a shaft and, you guessed it, powering a generator that is able to provide enough electricity to power the basic flight systems on the aircraft.

This ensures that even if all 6 of the normal generators on the aircraft happen to be unavailable (I can’t imagine a situation where this would ever happen), the pilots are still able to control the aircraft.

The more likely scenario where the aircraft has no electrical power is in the event of an emergency evacuation.

If the pilots deem that the situation outside the aircraft is safer than what is going on inside the aircraft, for example in the case of a rejected takeoff, the Captain will initiate an emergency evacuation.

As part of this process, the checklist calls for both engines to be shut down. This is to reduce the chance of a fire and, probably, more importantly, to remove the danger to passengers as they exit the aircraft.

At this stage of the flight, the only electrical power will be coming from the generators in the engines. As soon as they are shut down, this power source will be removed. As the aircraft is on the ground, the RAT will not deploy either as there is no airflow to make it spin.

As a result, the only remaining power source is the aircraft battery.

As soon as power is lost from the engine generators, the battery kicks in to provide just enough electricity to power vital systems such as the emergency exit lighting and the PA system.

An aircraft like the 787 is heavily reliant on electrical power to operate. As a result, a massive amount of redundancy is built into the system to cover any eventuality that could be imagined. The loss of a single generator is of little concern. Even if 2 were to be unavailable, for example, due to an engine failure, the APU can make up the deficit.

If the wrist were to happen and both engines failed, the RAT would still be able to provide enough power to allow the aircraft to glide in a controlled manner back to the ground.

If the power failure was to happen on the ground, the battery is sufficient to provide around 30mins energy to power the systems needed to evacuate the aircraft safely.

Featured Image by STEPHEN BRASHEAR/GETTY IMAGES.

Welcome to The Points Guy!

Editorial Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are the author’s alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

Disclaimer: The responses below are not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the bank advertiser’s responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Many of the offers that appear on this site are from companies from which The Points Guy UK receives compensation. This compensation helps pay the costs associated with running our website, and does not result in any additional fees to you. This site does not include all credit card companies or all available credit card offers. Please view our advertising policy page for more information.

Editorial Note: The Points Guy UK is independent; the opinions published here are always those of the reviewer, who has final editorial approval. The information, including card rates, product pricing and fees, presented in the review is accurate as of the date of the review – please check product pages for the most current information.

Welcome to The Points Guy!

The Points Guy UK is a trading name of Red Ventures Services Ltd, registered in England and Wales No. 11645522 Registered Office: Red Ventures Services Ltd, The Cooperage, 5 Copper Row, London, United Kingdom, SE1 2LH

Red Ventures Services Ltd is an appointed representative of Red Ventures Financial Ltd which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN: 803495). Red Ventures Financial Ltd is acting as a credit broker, not a lender.

Product links are provided on a non-advised basis. This means that no advice is given or implied and you are solely responsible for deciding whether the product is suitable for your needs. If you are not sure which is the right product for you, you should seek advice. 

By clicking a product link, you are departing from The Points Guy UK, and we cannot be held responsible for the accuracy of the information contained within the linked site.